Comparing the carbon footprints of urban and conventional agriculture - Isara Access content directly
Journal Articles Nature Cities Year : 2024

Comparing the carbon footprints of urban and conventional agriculture

Jason Hawes
Joshua Newell
Baptiste Grard
Nevin Cohen

Abstract

Urban agriculture (UA) is a widely proposed strategy to make cities and urban food systems more sustainable. Until now, we have lacked a comprehensive assessment of the environmental performance of UA relative to conventional agriculture, and results from earlier studies have been mixed. This is the first large-scale study to resolve this uncertainty across cities and types of UA, employing citizen science at 73 UA sites in Europe and the United States to compare UA products to food from conventional farms. Results reveal that the carbon footprint of food from UA is six times greater than conventional agriculture (420 gCO2e versus 70 gCO2e per serving). However, some UA crops (for example, tomatoes) and sites (for example, 25% of individually managed gardens) outperform conventional agriculture. These exceptions suggest that UA practitioners can reduce their climate impacts by cultivating crops that are typically greenhouse-grown or air-freighted, maintaining UA sites for many years, and leveraging circularity (waste as inputs).
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
Manuscript_R1_Final manuscript total.pdf (446.19 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origin : Files produced by the author(s)
Licence : CC BY - Attribution

Dates and versions

hal-04418573 , version 1 (29-01-2024)

Licence

Attribution

Identifiers

Cite

Jason Hawes, Benjamin Goldstein, Joshua Newell, Erica Dorr, Silvio Caputo, et al.. Comparing the carbon footprints of urban and conventional agriculture. Nature Cities, 2024, ⟨10.1038/s44284-023-00023-3⟩. ⟨hal-04418573⟩
51 View
3 Download

Altmetric

Share

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More